Is Munky right about Avatar?
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
radddogg
- RT GOD
- Posts: 13324
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:23 am
- Location: Sat scouring Sheaf's posts for epic quotez
Is Munky right about Avatar?
Following on from this thread
Is Avatar really as bad as Munky says?
No discussion, just simple good or bad.
Is Avatar really as bad as Munky says?
No discussion, just simple good or bad.
Swnt frpm my iphonr

Punx0r wrote:S&M always comes immediately to mind.

-
BrackenFox
- RT GOD
- Posts: 4989
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 4:23 pm
- feedback: 473479
- Location: Brockenhurst, Hants
- Contact:
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Where's the option for 'Meh'?
I thought it wasn't that bad, but not that good either. Watchable, but forgettable.
I thought it wasn't that bad, but not that good either. Watchable, but forgettable.
~ Steve.

2000 Saab 9-5 Aero HOT 2.3 turbo

2000 Saab 9-5 Aero HOT 2.3 turbo
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Is that the one with Leo di Caprio and the airplane?
Rob

The Racer - 1994 Roversport Tomcat Turbo race car
Turbodge - 1994 220 Track Hatch
Brembodge Big Brake Kits

The Racer - 1994 Roversport Tomcat Turbo race car
Turbodge - 1994 220 Track Hatch
Brembodge Big Brake Kits
-
bjrespect
- RT GOD
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 7:57 pm
- feedback: 800056
- Location: preston lancs
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
iv voteded bad even though i havent seen it
its due to that fooking sound they play every 2 mins on the radio
its due to that fooking sound they play every 2 mins on the radio
-
Null_Byte
- RT GOD
- Posts: 11339
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 11:47 pm
- feedback: 465046
- Location: today i will be mostly... under the bonnet
- Contact:
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
It was OK, but just reminded me of watching a disney movie. Same plot, same graphics. You do get to see sigourney weaver almost naked, but then you did in aliens, and no offence, but she was a lot younger then.
I can't for the life of me figure out why there is such a hype, apart from the fact it is 3D.
Hurt locker was also a watchable movie, but not exactly cimena of the centuary.
Honestly Zombieland was better than both, just for the lulz.
I can't for the life of me figure out why there is such a hype, apart from the fact it is 3D.
Hurt locker was also a watchable movie, but not exactly cimena of the centuary.
Honestly Zombieland was better than both, just for the lulz.
-
BazR
- Rovertech Owner

- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 11:50 pm
- feedback: 897724
- Location: Enniskillen, County Fermanagh, Northern Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Zombieland can be watched again and again. I enjoyed the others though.Null_Byte wrote:It was OK, but just reminded me of watching a disney movie. Same plot, same graphics. You do get to see sigourney weaver almost naked, but then you did in aliens, and no offence, but she was a lot younger then.
I can't for the life of me figure out why there is such a hype, apart from the fact it is 3D.
Hurt locker was also a watchable movie, but not exactly cimena of the centuary.
Honestly Zombieland was better than both, just for the lulz.
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Was good IMO. Maybe not as good as all the hype, but was still good. Glad I saw it in 3D too.
1999 Honda Accord Type R - 2157cc of VTEC 4dr fun 
2011 Mazda 6 Sport 2.2 Diesel - For the days I want torque and economy
2011 Mazda 6 Sport 2.2 Diesel - For the days I want torque and economy
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
ttrw2 wrote:Is that the one with Leo di Caprio and the airplane?
lol it's the one with tall, blue men and women that worship a tree

Of all the things i've lost in my life, i miss my mind the most. Ozzy
-
Richard_is
- Rovertech Kiloposter
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:16 pm
- feedback: 1037466
- Location: Swindon
-
shaggy
- Rovertech Kiloposter
- Posts: 1838
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 8:30 pm
- feedback: 484550
- Location: Telford
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Its not just the film though is it
The whole 3D experience (proper 3D) was class.
I thought it was a really good film and deserves the praise it gets, then again its all down to personal preference etc
The whole 3D experience (proper 3D) was class.
I thought it was a really good film and deserves the praise it gets, then again its all down to personal preference etc

-
TheRealStig
- Rovertech Kiloposter
- Posts: 1726
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:56 pm
- feedback: 989784
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
great film imo
-
munky
- RT GOD
- Posts: 8282
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:30 pm
- feedback: 870185
- Location: my own little world
- Contact:
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Null_Byte wrote:
Honestly Zombieland was better than both, just for the lulz.
'sometimes Talahasee's right, you've gotta enjoy the little things... even if that means destroying a whole lotta... little things.'
#rule 32.
Rich_1988 wrote:I unch in le harbogb
-
Nom
- Rovertech Kiloposter
- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 12:15 pm
- feedback: 1334185
- Location: Bilstein shocks next.
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Reminded me of a Jack Nicholson line in a Batman film which was a corruption of a quote from Robespierre the French revolutionary.
The Joker: You can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs.

Apologies for the spurious pic but it made me lol.
The Joker: You can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs.

Apologies for the spurious pic but it made me lol.
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
where's the 'who gives a sh1t what munky thinks' option?
It's the way of the future
great film....ttrw2 wrote:Is that the one with Leo di Caprio and the airplane?
It's the way of the future
-
james3990
- RT GOD
- Posts: 5356
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:23 pm
- feedback: 1036475
- Location: Birmingham
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
+1marc9584 wrote:TheRealStig wrote:great film imo
Yeah i thought it was good
Good film, it was different so I liked it
-
Vard66
- RT GOD
- Posts: 5499
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:49 am
- feedback: 850710
- Location: Near Swindon, Wiltshire.
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Vard.
1994 Rover 820 Vitesse fastback
1995 Discovery 3.9 V8
<< Vard's Vouch Thread >>
______________________________________________________________________

1994 Rover 820 Vitesse fastback
1995 Discovery 3.9 V8
<< Vard's Vouch Thread >>
______________________________________________________________________
-
Punx0r
- Rovertech Moderator

- Posts: 32552
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:42 pm
- feedback: 538363
- Location: Northants
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
+1shen wrote:where's the 'who gives a sh1t what munky thinks' option?
Anthony | 1997 800 Vitesse Coupe, 1985 SD1 Vitesse
-
munky
- RT GOD
- Posts: 8282
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:30 pm
- feedback: 870185
- Location: my own little world
- Contact:
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
dont blame me!
I was just reacting to rovex's tendency to be fanatic about anything he likes. I didnt ask anyone to agree.
I was just reacting to rovex's tendency to be fanatic about anything he likes. I didnt ask anyone to agree.
Rich_1988 wrote:I unch in le harbogb
-
Punx0r
- Rovertech Moderator

- Posts: 32552
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:42 pm
- feedback: 538363
- Location: Northants
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Perhaps he's just passionate and dedicated?
How's the running going BTW?
How's the running going BTW?
Anthony | 1997 800 Vitesse Coupe, 1985 SD1 Vitesse
-
munky
- RT GOD
- Posts: 8282
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:30 pm
- feedback: 870185
- Location: my own little world
- Contact:
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
passionate/fanatical... same difference.
Badly.
Badly.
Rich_1988 wrote:I unch in le harbogb
-
Roverdose214
- !BANNED!
- Posts: 2831
- Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 8:04 pm
- feedback: 1037075
- Location: Wearing my harness in Telford!
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Great film, to long tho. Sigourey Weaver aint lookin to bad tho 
Roverdose214 wrote:Do you have a cage rob?
52' ZS Fixing....Again!ttrw2 wrote:Yes, but the girlf and I don't talk about it out of the house....
-
618ireland
- RT GOD
- Posts: 4115
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:52 pm
- feedback: 1040793
- Location: Cork, Ireland
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
+ 1BrackenFox wrote: it wasn't that bad, but not that good either. Watchable, but forgettable.
ie I reckon Munky is right tbh.
1990 414si, 1995 214SEi, 2005 Mondeo, 1999 618, 1995 Celica SSII,
1997 400 D, 1993 Prelude, 1992 W124 250d, 1993 520i,
1997 216 Tomcat, 2002 MG ZT 180+, 2008 Grand Cherokee 3.0CRD

1997 400 D, 1993 Prelude, 1992 W124 250d, 1993 520i,
1997 216 Tomcat, 2002 MG ZT 180+, 2008 Grand Cherokee 3.0CRD

Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Im not fanatical about it, i just didnt think the criticism it got was justified and sometimes came across as a bit pretentious. The only thing im fanatical about is my absolutely hatred of Apple and its products. 

Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
that iPhone thingy works well though doesn't it...and they do have a strong history for designing product which make technology more user friendly, such as windows for example.rovex wrote:Im not fanatical about it, i just didnt think the criticism it got was justified and sometimes came across as a bit pretentious. The only thing im fanatical about is my absolutely hatred of Apple and its products.
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Windows 7 - doing what Mac OSX has been doing for the past few years lol.
Steve
W/2000 Mini Cooper Sportspack
W/2000 Mini Cooper Sportspack
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Apart from crashing and looking hideous you mean (oh and running games).
The iPhone? Well it works well enough i guess, depending on you want to do. Shame its ugly, old and limited, and expensive.
The iPhone? Well it works well enough i guess, depending on you want to do. Shame its ugly, old and limited, and expensive.

Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Ok well got the Blu-ray. Whatever you think of the film the blu-ray is absolutely stunning. It really doesnt need 3D at all. The disc is one of the best ive ever seen. Its absolutely reference quality, both picture and audio are stunning. The review at blu-ray.com says it all.
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Avatar-Bl ... view/7847/
Even if you dont like the film, the disc is a must. Like in the early days of HD, certain films were a must, just for the spectacle. I think The Chronicles of Riddick was an example of a rubbish film with a reference quality transfer. Perhaps thats why Avatar has broken yet another record. Its the fastest selling BD ever, selling 1.5 million in the US on the first day. The Dark Knight held the record before with 600k.
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Avatar-Bl ... view/7847/
Even if you dont like the film, the disc is a must. Like in the early days of HD, certain films were a must, just for the spectacle. I think The Chronicles of Riddick was an example of a rubbish film with a reference quality transfer. Perhaps thats why Avatar has broken yet another record. Its the fastest selling BD ever, selling 1.5 million in the US on the first day. The Dark Knight held the record before with 600k.

Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
rovex wrote:Ok well got the Blu-ray. Whatever you think of the film the blu-ray is absolutely stunning. It really doesnt need 3D at all. The disc is one of the best ive ever seen. Its absolutely reference quality, both picture and audio are stunning. The review at blu-ray.com says it all.
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Avatar-Bl ... view/7847/
Even if you dont like the film, the disc is a must. Like in the early days of HD, certain films were a must, just for the spectacle. I think The Chronicles of Riddick was an example of a rubbish film with a reference quality transfer. Perhaps thats why Avatar has broken yet another record. Its the fastest selling BD ever, selling 1.5 million in the US on the first day. The Dark Knight held the record before with 600k.
Im gutted i had my blu ray copy sent to work so cant get it till monday but i saw it at the cinema and cant wait to watch in on blu, im always on blu-ray.com as well so i saw the review last night cant wait to hear the explosions in dts hd

-
618ireland
- RT GOD
- Posts: 4115
- Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:52 pm
- feedback: 1040793
- Location: Cork, Ireland
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
There is not way I'd sit through that sh1t againrovex wrote:
Even if you dont like the film, the disc is a must
1990 414si, 1995 214SEi, 2005 Mondeo, 1999 618, 1995 Celica SSII,
1997 400 D, 1993 Prelude, 1992 W124 250d, 1993 520i,
1997 216 Tomcat, 2002 MG ZT 180+, 2008 Grand Cherokee 3.0CRD

1997 400 D, 1993 Prelude, 1992 W124 250d, 1993 520i,
1997 216 Tomcat, 2002 MG ZT 180+, 2008 Grand Cherokee 3.0CRD

-
Null_Byte
- RT GOD
- Posts: 11339
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 11:47 pm
- feedback: 465046
- Location: today i will be mostly... under the bonnet
- Contact:
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
The Chronicles of Riddick was a way better film than avatar imho.
-
munky
- RT GOD
- Posts: 8282
- Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:30 pm
- feedback: 870185
- Location: my own little world
- Contact:
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
It was, but it was no where near as good as pitch black.
On a side note, I just watched 'knowing' on sky movies... tinky winky LOL what an utter utter bag of sh*t. I had tears of laughter rolling down my face when the clouds opened and the 'higher beings' appeared. Epic.
On a side note, I just watched 'knowing' on sky movies... tinky winky LOL what an utter utter bag of sh*t. I had tears of laughter rolling down my face when the clouds opened and the 'higher beings' appeared. Epic.
Rich_1988 wrote:I unch in le harbogb
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
Youwont be disappointed. The picture really is flawless. No grain, no shimmer, no artifacting whatsoever. Its got to be one opf the best BDs ive seen. As long as your TV is big and your speakers loud its a winner. The BD shows that the film doesnt really need 3D at all.marc9584 wrote:rovex wrote:Ok well got the Blu-ray. Whatever you think of the film the blu-ray is absolutely stunning. It really doesnt need 3D at all. The disc is one of the best ive ever seen. Its absolutely reference quality, both picture and audio are stunning. The review at blu-ray.com says it all.
http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Avatar-Bl ... view/7847/
Even if you dont like the film, the disc is a must. Like in the early days of HD, certain films were a must, just for the spectacle. I think The Chronicles of Riddick was an example of a rubbish film with a reference quality transfer. Perhaps thats why Avatar has broken yet another record. Its the fastest selling BD ever, selling 1.5 million in the US on the first day. The Dark Knight held the record before with 600k.
Im gutted i had my blu ray copy sent to work so cant get it till monday but i saw it at the cinema and cant wait to watch in on blu, im always on blu-ray.com as well so i saw the review last night cant wait to hear the explosions in dts hd
Blu-ray.com mentioned that at the very end of the disc after the credits there is a THX demo. It sounds fabulous!
Last edited by rovex on Sat Apr 24, 2010 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

-
tonyrally
- Rovertech Kiloposter
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:22 pm
- feedback: 1007506
- Location: hull
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
i thought it was well to put it bluntly 5hit. but i preffer older films to be honest so im a bit biast. allthought i only watched it because my mate said its the best film hes ever seen...
Re: Is Munky right about Avatar?
For me movies have to offer something above and beyond TV. Most of the best movies could have been made for TV. Avatar couldn't, that why its important we have movies like this.
I think it gets better the more times you see it. You switch off at the cheesier parts and can then just enjoy the visuals, especially the battle scene at the end, which is pretty awesome.
I think it gets better the more times you see it. You switch off at the cheesier parts and can then just enjoy the visuals, especially the battle scene at the end, which is pretty awesome.



