http://www.shipsnostalgia.com/guides/Wi ... ng_Process
Fascinating process IMO.
Moderator: Forum Moderators



Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us

It says 1957/58peteT16 wrote:Good find, I'd say that dates from the 50s or 60s,
Vard66 wrote: our feelings about saloons shall never be the wedge between us


My thoughts exactly! Looks like pins in some of the photos, guessing some sort of fitment that stops rotation/keeps it all lined up when slotted together?Punx0r wrote:Bother knows what holds the crank together!

Doesn't work with modern economics though for a start, and then there are the limitations in accuracy...mike88 wrote:Looks amazing, I MUCH prefer this method to the modern equivalent.


Sadly, as with many things, the US airlines, etc.. adopted their partisan "not made here syndrome", so wouldn't touch it, expecting something better to come out of Boeing or McDonnel Douglas.Punx0r wrote: Concorde was a technological triumph, but not a commercial success, so it depends on your priorities, really. The Americans, showing uncharacteristic conservatism, went for the pedestrian jumbo jets and got minted.

