super 4x4 hehe

For things that don't fit into a category. i.e. non-motor related subjects.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

gray2008
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:35 pm

super 4x4 hehe

Post by gray2008 »

oooh, i want one ... now where did i put that spare 70k

http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArtic ... Q7/231585/
Leo
Return of the K777
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 9:21 pm
feedback: 1118482
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Post by Leo »

:lol:

Yeah it's a beast but how pointless!?

Did you read the comments forum on that site? I like this response:
cimardinius wrote: In the 14th century (and again, to a lesser extent, in the 18th) men took to wearing longer and longer shoes, as a display of how much they could afford to pay for them.

They got so long that they had to curl up the toes in a spiral and attach this with a strap to their thigh, as they had become totally unsuitable for their original purpose - to walk in.

However, the unsuitability of these shoes for purpose did not stop them - if the rhubarb in a neighbouring castle had got them, then they were going to have them too!

When social anthropologists look back (in a few hundred years) at idiotic manifestations of ego run riot, they will no doubt put these shoes and vehicles like this Audi in the same class of folly.

At least, now their students will have two good idiotic examples to laugh at.
:nodshead:
91 Citroen BX GTi 8v - bought March 13
95 Ford Mondeo 1.8i Ghia - March 11 - March 13 - scrapped
98 620 SLDi - July 08 - March 11
97 420 GSDi - dumped in France
94 420 GSi Turbo, 235bhp. Dec 03 - May 08, still missed
93 214 Si - June 02 - Feb 04
Punx0r
Rovertech Moderator
Rovertech Moderator
Posts: 32552
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 8:42 pm
feedback: 538363
Location: Northants

Post by Punx0r »

I understand putting it in the R8 to prove a point, but with the Q7 haven't they purposely made the ultimate Chelsea tractor?
Anthony | 1997 800 Vitesse Coupe, 1985 SD1 Vitesse
Aquila
Forum Senior
Posts: 311
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:31 am
Location: Colchester, Essex

Post by Aquila »

Punx0r wrote:I understand putting it in the R8 to prove a point, but with the Q7 haven't they purposely made the ultimate Chelsea tractor?
They've gone one better - a Richmond Panzer..!

Image
Aquila

Licat volare si super tergum aquila volat...
Vard66
RT GOD
Posts: 5499
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:49 am
feedback: 850710
Location: Near Swindon, Wiltshire.

Post by Vard66 »

Toss that, spend 68 odd and get the tiptronic R8 instead. or 69 for a 911 Turbo... or just spend about forty odd and buy a pretty much perfect V Spec II Nur... or even the Z tuned R34....
Vard.

1994 Rover 820 Vitesse fastback
1995 Discovery 3.9 V8
<< Vard's Vouch Thread >>
______________________________________________________________________
Image
gray2008
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:35 pm

Post by gray2008 »

got to admit the R8 sounds good, 20mpg is pretty good in a 700ft/lb monster hehe
Sheaf
RT GOD
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 10:03 am
feedback: 332244

Post by Sheaf »

Got to agree, it's a tad pointless.

I see those Porshe 4x4 things about and they're about 500bhp odd, but seriously, what's the point, they're massive and ugly. I'd rather drive a much slower car which looks nice and wasn't the size of a house.

If you need a 4x4 buy a Land rover or a Toyota or something. If you want something fast and luxurious buy an Audi A8, if you just want something fast buy a feckin 2 seater. The whole SUV with a huge engine is just silly IMO, atleast in this country where most fast roads are full of corners. In the US it makes a bit more sense, but here it makes very little.
1999 Honda Accord Type R - 2157cc of VTEC 4dr fun :vtec:
2011 Mazda 6 Sport 2.2 Diesel - For the days I want torque and economy
Post Reply

Return to “The Living Room (Posh man's lounge)”