civic 1.8vti vtec 5door hatch?

Chat about MG-Rovers, MG-Rover ownership and anything MGs or Rovers in general.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

sharky
RT GOD
Posts: 7158
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:38 pm
feedback: 203651
Location: north devon - oooooaaarr!
Contact:

civic 1.8vti vtec 5door hatch?

Post by sharky »

theres a guy u wants to race me in 1 of these (even though i said im not racing on the road)
he says his is 180bhp and has had 'hardly anything' done to it.
am i right in saying that these are 167bhp in standard form?

anyway, i even told him that with a few more mods mine will be pushing out arround 300bhp but he really isn't having any of it.

as we know, from jonny's video's, the vtec's are quick... but what do you reckon?
Image
Image
Chris - 200ViT, MGZR 120 and Focus Estate
MSN= sharky620ti@hotmail.com
My feedback http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 651#203651
ADSVVCCOUPE
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1654
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 10:00 pm
Location: Ely, Cambridgeshire

Post by ADSVVCCOUPE »

i thought that the 1.8vti civic was 179ps
coupe 180
Image
powerflow cat back system. 173.5bhp (engine advantages 12/12/04)
Standing quarter......15.60 @ 88mph on the 18's
(jurby 20/6/04)
sharky
RT GOD
Posts: 7158
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:38 pm
feedback: 203651
Location: north devon - oooooaaarr!
Contact:

Post by sharky »

it might be, im just going by what i found on a website.

i think its about a T or S reg
Image
Image
Chris - 200ViT, MGZR 120 and Focus Estate
MSN= sharky620ti@hotmail.com
My feedback http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 651#203651
Bjorn
RT GOD
Posts: 4151
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:50 am
feedback: 194433
Location: In Somerset

Post by Bjorn »

I was led to believe the VTi Civics were 160ish brake - thought only the Integra Type R engine was more - could be wrong.
Was: 1994 Rover 220 Coupe Turbo
Now: 2010 SEAT Leon Cupra
sharky
RT GOD
Posts: 7158
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:38 pm
feedback: 203651
Location: north devon - oooooaaarr!
Contact:

Post by sharky »

thats what i though bjorn.

but anyway... what do you reckon? would he have me?
Image
Image
Chris - 200ViT, MGZR 120 and Focus Estate
MSN= sharky620ti@hotmail.com
My feedback http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 651#203651
lee2003
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: essex

Post by lee2003 »

there is a way to sort if hes that full of it just say to youll be up for it but put log books on the table and who ever wins ie you :wink: take his car and pull it apart in front of him seen this done on a rs turbo sooo funny watching the youngster almost crying :D :D and yes i know im going to hell for laughing :twisted:
Now in pipe and slipper land.
Sheaf
RT GOD
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 10:03 am
feedback: 332244

Post by Sheaf »

The 1.8 VTi is 167bhp
Peak torque something like 122lb ft I think.

0-60 in around 8 seconds
Top end 139ish
Apparently they weigh 1300kg :shock:
Insurance group 15

Not a match for a rover turbo in standard form I wouldn't have thought, but not slow either.

It's the 1.6 vti (3dr) which is 160bhp (B16), with less torque. They are lighter though.

They have the B18C4 engine in them, not the same as the integra type R engine (B18C5), not as revvy apparently, although they do go to over 8000rpm. The tegs are 195bhp I think. The VTi also doesn't have as short gear ratios as a teg.

Personally I like em though, and as soon as I've secured a job I'll be parting with money for one. I dont want to commit to paying £1400 + a year for insurance without having a job though.

Alex.
jase
RT GOD
Posts: 3785
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2003 8:39 pm
feedback: 780098
Location: Chester

Post by jase »

Sharky, theres only 1 sure way.....

And its not strictly racing is it? your just 'overtaking' someone, or atleast trying to!

My moneys on you btw.

J
"To try is the first step on the long road to failure"

mk3 200ti: 303bhp +323ftlbs http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=3553
BMW 135i: 390bhp +410ftlbs
Feedback: http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 44&t=83073
sharky
RT GOD
Posts: 7158
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:38 pm
feedback: 203651
Location: north devon - oooooaaarr!
Contact:

Post by sharky »

cheers for that mate.

so how much does my ti weigh? :oops:

he's such a nonse, he said that my engine is too weak for 300bhp and the rover never made a 2.1 (this is after i told him what had been done to mine, but he just doesn't understand) as far as he is concerned, its a rover, so its shite!
Image
Image
Chris - 200ViT, MGZR 120 and Focus Estate
MSN= sharky620ti@hotmail.com
My feedback http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 651#203651
keironewoodgate
Rovertech Veteran
Posts: 831
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 4:29 am
Location: Southampton
Contact:

Post by keironewoodgate »

[quote="Sheaf"]The 1.8 VTi is 167bhp
Peak torque something like 122lb ft I think.

0-60 in around 8 seconds
Top end 139ish
Apparently they weigh 1300kg :shock:
Insurance group 15
quote]

Thats spot on.

You'll kill him in a race, if i were you i wouldn't waste your petrol on it.

But if you must dont forget to use A "private" test track. :D
420gsi Turbo, gone but not forgotten.
New toy? BRG Coupe turbo with cream leather!!
lee2003
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: essex

Post by lee2003 »

why not show him the anracing web site and pull all the info from this site to show him how much of a muppet hes being (if hes wearing a baseball cap get him to take it off as this seems to affect the iq in none rover drivers :P :P )
Now in pipe and slipper land.
sharky
RT GOD
Posts: 7158
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:38 pm
feedback: 203651
Location: north devon - oooooaaarr!
Contact:

Post by sharky »

already shown him the ANR site but i dont think he understands it.
it's pi55ing me off because he thinks that because i wont race him on the road, he thinks im scared that i'll loose.

and he wants to do it on a tiny little windy lane which is about 8 miles long where michael schumacher would have trouble overtaking a milk float. its just not possible... whoever got in front 1st would stay there for the whole race!
Image
Image
Chris - 200ViT, MGZR 120 and Focus Estate
MSN= sharky620ti@hotmail.com
My feedback http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 651#203651
Craig
RT GOD
Posts: 6146
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 10:39 am
feedback: 194278
Location: West London/Middx

Post by Craig »

My advice? Give him a slap, tell him to piddle off and play with his action man (or Barbie if he's that way inclined) and stop rising to the bait so easily.
Roverlessness - what a strange feeling!
lee2003
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: essex

Post by lee2003 »

i agree with craig if hes that bad just tell him to bog off oh and give him a nappy change and dummy :!: hes reading to much max power mines quicker than yours etc etc. god i must be getting old :shock:
Now in pipe and slipper land.
Bjorn
RT GOD
Posts: 4151
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:50 am
feedback: 194433
Location: In Somerset

Post by Bjorn »

If yours were standard, then it maybe a close one - however with your spec, I would expect yours to come through the victor ;)
Was: 1994 Rover 220 Coupe Turbo
Now: 2010 SEAT Leon Cupra
lee2003
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: essex

Post by lee2003 »

heres an idea do you live near castle combe race track why not invite him down and have a proper race with him around a nice safe track with lots of run off etc and the first aiders there to put his jaw back in place after its hit the floor when you beat him :D and if you do it for log books ill have the car of you as i need a skip :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Now in pipe and slipper land.
Bjorn
RT GOD
Posts: 4151
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:50 am
feedback: 194433
Location: In Somerset

Post by Bjorn »

As long as Sharkys suspension setup is sorted I would back that, however Honda's do handle immsensly well from factory (for fwd) so would keep up with mr sharky at those twisties on the circuit ;)
Was: 1994 Rover 220 Coupe Turbo
Now: 2010 SEAT Leon Cupra
lee2003
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: essex

Post by lee2003 »

yer but this guy is not listening to reason so i doubt he could drive to the cars limits anyway. :wink: his baseball cap might get in the way :) if this is sorted ill travel all the way from essex just to see this 8)
Now in pipe and slipper land.
Mark
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1936
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 4:29 pm
Location: 8800rpm - in Vtec

Post by Mark »

Dans CRX now has a B18C4 in it - Wanna play with that one ;)

Seriously - a 1.8VTi-S will give most cars a decent run for its money.


Mark
Image

The only replacement for displacement .................is technology !!
1993 216 turbo cabriolet - going soon
1987 Merc 190 3.2 twin turbo
1992 B20 CRX - nasp :roll:
1993 Mercedes 300SL
Sheaf
RT GOD
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 10:03 am
feedback: 332244

Post by Sheaf »

sharky620ti wrote:cheers for that mate.

so how much does my ti weigh? :oops:



Pass.

I got that weight from
http://www.cuddles.abelgratis.net/kerbweights.htm
and it doesn't list the ti. I'm guessing somewhere around 1300 - 1350?
I think the civic comes with lead bumpers to make it that heavy. That website could be wrong however.

I forgot to mention the standard 1/4 mile time is 16.4 seconds.

However there are some quicker vtis about, I've heard of one guy who has exhaust & breathing mods and a teg gearbox who got 15.2s 1/4 I think...

And take a look at
http://forum.hondarevolutions.com/setups/?setupID=126

That's one seriously modded, and nice car. Somewhere around 300bhp it's supposed to be.

However as people have mentioned, on twisties it may have more of a chance, apparently they handle well, and they come with 282mm front discs as standard so the brakes aren't bad...

Alex.
lee2003
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: essex

Post by lee2003 »

totally agree with you mark there are some very quick ones around here and theres a turbo as well not been up against it but its around here somewhere its just that this young lad needs to know about rovers thats all mate if i said i could beat everybody id be down to his level as, i maybe getting older but im also wiser :D
Now in pipe and slipper land.
Mark
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1936
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 4:29 pm
Location: 8800rpm - in Vtec

Post by Mark »

If your in Essex

Look out for a Silver CRX with a Carbon bonnet - It WILL kick a55 - seriously :D

I'm hoping for over 300hp from it !

Mark
Image

The only replacement for displacement .................is technology !!
1993 216 turbo cabriolet - going soon
1987 Merc 190 3.2 twin turbo
1992 B20 CRX - nasp :roll:
1993 Mercedes 300SL
lee2003
Rovertech Kiloposter
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:03 pm
Location: essex

Post by lee2003 »

where abouts mate im always interested in other cars ive built my own 205turbo a few years ago and that was knocking on the door of 300 bhp :D
Now in pipe and slipper land.
Bjorn
RT GOD
Posts: 4151
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:50 am
feedback: 194433
Location: In Somerset

Post by Bjorn »

Mark wrote:Dans CRX now has a B18C4 in it - Wanna play with that one ;)

Seriously - a 1.8VTi-S will give most cars a decent run for its money.


Mark


fersactly wot I'm saying ;)
Was: 1994 Rover 220 Coupe Turbo
Now: 2010 SEAT Leon Cupra
sharky
RT GOD
Posts: 7158
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:38 pm
feedback: 203651
Location: north devon - oooooaaarr!
Contact:

Post by sharky »

lol, suspension is something that i dont wanna talk about at the moment.

the main thing that bothers me is that he has no idea about these car's. its as if he thinks its unmoddable (is that a word?)

he also added "even if its 800bhp, its still a rover" :roll:
Image
Image
Chris - 200ViT, MGZR 120 and Focus Estate
MSN= sharky620ti@hotmail.com
My feedback http://www.rt2468abcd.r8technology.co.uk/viewtopi ... 651#203651
Bjorn
RT GOD
Posts: 4151
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:50 am
feedback: 194433
Location: In Somerset

Post by Bjorn »

sharky620ti wrote:lol, suspension is something that i dont wanna talk about at the moment.

the main thing that bothers me is that he has no idea about these car's. its as if he thinks its unmoddable (is that a word?)

he also added "even if its 800bhp, its still a rover" :roll:


Dont you just love the the old 'Rover' image thing, just put on yer flat cap smoke yer pipe and waste 'im ;)
Was: 1994 Rover 220 Coupe Turbo
Now: 2010 SEAT Leon Cupra
broona
Forum Junior
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 9:41 pm

Post by broona »

My dad's got a P reg 1.8 Vti 4 door saloon thingie, standard except for a stainless steel exhaust and some kind if 'Iceman?' induction kit. It's extremely quick for what it is, but I definitely wouldn't say it's 2 litre turbo quick. Totally kicks arse with my 220 GTI unfortunately!!! :oops:
Nash
Rovertech Veteran
Posts: 561
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 9:04 pm
Location: Cheshire & Suffolk

Post by Nash »

My mate picks his CTR up this week so no dowt we will have a race just as a comparisson. He used to own a scooby wrx and said that when he was in mine felt just as quick if not quicker, i have drove it and can say theres not much difference[but then i got an airfield to test that on].

The point is he said theres no way i will beat you in the CTR thats from his mouth to. I have raced a CTR top end when was running 7psi and couldnt belive it when he had to move over to let me past as i was having to back off.

I have also raced a lads integra i know which is running about 187bhp he just beat me i was still running 7psi with a shagged manifold. He wouldnt stand a chance now but aint seen him about to prove it. Sharky if i can do that in an almost standard T16t then you will stuff him.
Cookie Racing stage 1 tune ;)
Image
2WD Saph Cossie :) ???Bhp never running long enough to find out lol
radddogg
RT GOD
Posts: 13324
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Sat scouring Sheaf's posts for epic quotez

Post by radddogg »

sharky620ti wrote:lol, suspension is something that i dont wanna talk about at the moment.

the main thing that bothers me is that he has no idea about these car's. its as if he thinks its unmoddable (is that a word?)

he also added "even if its 800bhp, its still a rover" :roll:


Honda concerto = rover 200/400
Honda Accord = rover 600
Honda civic saloon = rover 400
Honda Legend = Rover 800

Helloooooo, McFly? :roll:
Swnt frpm my iphonr
Punx0r wrote:S&M always comes immediately to mind.
Image
Sheaf
RT GOD
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 10:03 am
feedback: 332244

Post by Sheaf »

He's got a point.

The Honda Civic 1.8 Vtis are basically a 400/45/ZS. They were built in a rover factory, and only available in the uk because of this. I'm guessing rover designed the chassis too cos they are still using it and honda aren't.

The engine is obviously honda though, and the suspension I think.
Bjorn
RT GOD
Posts: 4151
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:50 am
feedback: 194433
Location: In Somerset

Post by Bjorn »

No I would have thought that Rover didnt design the chassis - Honda dont use it anymore as they can afford the time/research to develop new chassis
Was: 1994 Rover 220 Coupe Turbo
Now: 2010 SEAT Leon Cupra
Sheaf
RT GOD
Posts: 10936
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 10:03 am
feedback: 332244

Post by Sheaf »

Good point.
If honda did design it, it was certianly nice of them to let rover keep using it, as the ZS has done well..
I was only guessing and basing it half on the thought that I think rover made the 200 chasis, but honda got to use the hatchback for the concerto.

I wonder why it was only honda who got the estate though, and only rover who got the saloon.

Although I think I remember seeing somwhere a civic estate modded to look like a rover, and with a t16 turbo in it. Think it was a motobuild jobbie.
Jonny 5
RT GOD
Posts: 6262
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 12:26 am
feedback: 194268
Location: VTAK le' Teg

Post by Jonny 5 »

Sheaf wrote: I'm guessing rover designed the chassis too cos they are still using it and honda aren't.



Thats more of a reason to suggest Honda design it.
Bjorn
RT GOD
Posts: 4151
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 9:50 am
feedback: 194433
Location: In Somerset

Post by Bjorn »

Sheaf wrote:Good point.
If honda did design it, it was certianly nice of them to let rover keep using it, as the ZS has done well..
I was only guessing and basing it half on the thought that I think rover made the 200 chasis, but honda got to use the hatchback for the concerto.

I wonder why it was only honda who got the estate though, and only rover who got the saloon.

Although I think I remember seeing somwhere a civic estate modded to look like a rover, and with a t16 turbo in it. Think it was a motobuild jobbie.


In the mk 2 200/400 it was a joint design by Rover/Honda - both learning off each other, when it came to the bubble 200 mk3 and 400 it was a whole Honda design.
Was: 1994 Rover 220 Coupe Turbo
Now: 2010 SEAT Leon Cupra
bgunn
RT GOD
Posts: 4545
Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2003 9:00 am
feedback: 208002

Post by bgunn »

Bjorn wrote:
In the mk 2 200/400 it was a joint design by Rover/Honda - both learning off each other, when it came to the bubble 200 mk3 and 400 it was a whole Honda design.


The R3 is actually more Rover than the R8 - as the rear suspension is modified Maestro, the front suspension is the same - which was developed pretty equally..

The HH-R is pure Honda in terms of engineering..

Brian.
Post Reply

Return to “MG/Rover Chat”